FQFT Artifact Map & Public Computation Spine
Public Artifact Cartography, Kernel Dependencies & Reproducibility Spine
Spine Position
Research Root · FQFT Frontier · Artifact Map & Computation Spine
Institutional Authority: Global Institute of Logic & Cybernetics (GILC)
Parent Framework: Fractal Quantum Field Theory (FQFT)
Corpus Layer: Computational Provenance & Artifact Registry
1. Overview & Reproducibility Spine
This page maps the formal artifacts, scripts, numerical datasets, and publication routes required to inspect and replicate the FQFT computational spine.
1. Input Parameters
| Symbol | Value | Role | Source | Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
q | 5 | Ramanujan graph degree used by the FQFT computation spine. | FQFT prediction card / Paper I | Paper-internal input. Requires independent mathematical and physical review. |
D*H | 27.6 ± 0.3 | Dimensional fixed point used throughout the FQFT v2.0 series. | FQFT Paper I / prediction card | Paper-internal fixed-point value derived from stated inputs; not externally validated. |
ΛUV | MPl | Planck-scale UV boundary condition. | FQFT prediction card | Model assumption / scale choice requiring review. |
gR | 0.267 | Coupling parameter used in the prediction framework. | FQFT prediction card | Paper-internal input. |
yt | 1 | Top Yukawa treated as spectral unit in the FQFT computation. | FQFT Paper I / prediction card | Normalization convention requiring review. |
2. Required Artifacts
| Artifact | Type | Function | Status / Link | Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQFT Series Computational Companion | zenodo-record | Public Zenodo record for the reproducible prediction framework for Papers I–X. | External Link | Public provenance record; DOI and metadata require manual verification if Zenodo access is rate-limited. |
| FQFT Paper I Zenodo Record | zenodo-record | Kernel paper route for assumptions, action, fixed point, spectral bands, and falsifiable prediction spine. | External Link | Public paper record; not peer-review acceptance. |
| FQFT Prediction Ledger Zenodo Record | zenodo-record | Prediction table and experimental forecast overview. | External Link | Forecast ledger; not external validation. |
| fqft compute v2.py | code | Local computation script referenced by the FQFT prediction card and computational companion. | pending-local-file | Do not claim reproducibility until exact script and runtime are present locally and verified. |
3. Reproduction Steps
- Verify Paper I assumptions and notation.
- Verify the computational companion Zenodo record.
- Obtain exact computation script and version.
- Confirm input parameter table.
- Run script in a clean environment.
- Compare generated outputs to prediction ledger.
- Record mismatches.
- Route mathematical claims to Formalization Targets.
- Route experimental claims to Falsifiability Matrix.
4. Expected Outputs
| Output | Description | Route | Review Need | Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prediction Table | Neutrino ordering, θ13, Higgs triple coupling, axion mass, dark matter cross-section, CKM/PMNS comparisons, Yukawa hierarchy. | Link | Independent reproduction of each number and sensitivity analysis against assumptions. | Paper-internal prediction output; not [REDACTED: UNBOUNDED CLAIM]. |
| Falsifiability Matrix | Classification of predictions by near-term tests, medium-term tests, existing comparisons, and formalization targets. | Link | External review of test conditions and defeat criteria. | Review routing layer; not validation. |
| Paper I Kernel Claims | FQFT action, dimensional beta-function, fixed point, standard QFT recovery route, spectral mass formula, generation claim. | Link | Formal mathematical review and proof-dependency mapping. | Theoretical kernel and formalization target. |
5. Review Boundary
This protocol supports reproducibility attempts and review. It does not claim that the outputs are independently validated or experimentally confirmed.
2. Core Scientific & Computational Artifacts
Every computational artifact is tracked by its canonical repository location, public provenance record, and epistemic classification:
| Artifact Name | Repository Location | Public Provenance Target | Epistemic Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper I Kernel | docs/03-research/fqft-paper-i.md | Zenodo / Local Markdown | Theoretical Specification (FQFT-Paper-I) |
| Computational Companion | docs/03-research/fqft-computational-companion.md | Zenodo Record 20488566 | Numerical Benchmark (P1 NUMERICAL_BENCHMARK) |
| Prediction Ledger | docs/03-research/fqft-prediction-ledger.md | In-Corpus Register | Prediction Taxonomy (P0–P6) |
| Falsifiability Matrix | docs/03-research/fqft-falsifiability-matrix.md | In-Corpus Register | Pre-Registered Falsification Criteria |
| Formalization Targets | docs/03-research/formalization-targets.md | In-Corpus Register | Lean 4 Theorem Verification Ledger |
| DOI Locking Protocol | docs/03-research/fqft-doi-locking-protocol.md | In-Corpus Register | Provenance Verification Protocol |
| Errata Ledger | docs/03-research/fqft-errata.md | In-Corpus Register | Correction & Verification Log |
3. Paper I Kernel Dependency
The Paper I technical route provides the core equation spine and theorem targets upon which all subsequent computational artifacts depend:
- FQFT Paper I Kernel Route — Core field equations, shifted Laplacian spectrum, and scale-hierarchy derivation.
- FQFT Computational Companion — Numerical execution protocol and parameter ledger.
- FQFT Prediction Ledger — 7-tier prediction accounting and empirical channel registry.
4. DOI & Paper-Series Verification
The artifact map must be cross-referenced with the DOI locking protocol before any publication metadata is finalized:
- FQFT DOI Locking Protocol — Strict requirements for public record verification.
- FQFT Theoretical Frontier — Overview of the FQFT monograph series (Papers I–X).
- Publications & Provenance — Sovereign public publication registry.
5. Epistemic Claim Boundary
Claim Boundary
This artifact map documents internal routes, external repositories, and dependency graphs. Computational accessibility and code replication do not imply independent experimental validation, peer-review acceptance, or physical confirmation of foundational hypotheses.
6. Canonical Continuations
| Destination | Scope & Focus | Primary Route |
|---|---|---|
| FQFT Paper I | Technical formulation and field equations | Open Kernel Route |
| Prediction Ledger | 7-tier prediction taxonomy & parameter accounting | Open Prediction Ledger |
| Falsifiability Matrix | Pre-registered failure criteria & null benchmarks | Open Falsifiability Matrix |
| Computational Companion | Execution protocol & numerical reproduction | Open Companion |
| Formalization Targets | Lean 4 formal proof readiness & theorem ledger | Open Formalization Targets |
| Publications Registry | Public provenance and archived papers | Open Publications |